feat(traceability): add GitHub Issue intake workflow to spec protocol#1209
Merged
feat(traceability): add GitHub Issue intake workflow to spec protocol#1209
Conversation
Document the workflow for translating GitHub Issues into the REQ, DESIGN, TASK spec layer. Add source field (GH-<number>) for bidirectional linking between issues and specs. Define triage, translation, link-back, and decomposition steps. Include skip criteria and migration guidance. Fixes #720 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
Contributor
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
Contributor
PR Validation ReportTip ✅ Status: PASS Description Validation
QA Validation
Powered by PR Validation workflow |
coderabbitai
bot
added
area-workflows
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review infoConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds optional Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)mermaid Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.agents/governance/traceability-protocol.md (1)
41-46: Convert text diagram to Mermaid.The text-based diagram should use Mermaid syntax instead of ASCII art. As per coding guidelines, governance documents should use Mermaid for diagrams.
📊 Proposed Mermaid diagram
-```text -GitHub Issue --> REQ-NNN --> DESIGN-NNN --> TASK-NNN - | | - | +-- source: GH-<issue> - +-- Spec link added as issue comment -``` +```mermaid +flowchart LR + GH[GitHub Issue] -->|translate| REQ[REQ-NNN] + REQ -->|decompose| DESIGN[DESIGN-NNN] + DESIGN -->|decompose| TASK[TASK-NNN] + REQ -.->|source: GH-number| GH + GH -.->|comment: REQ-NNN| REQ +```🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.agents/governance/traceability-protocol.md around lines 41 - 46, Replace the ASCII/text diagram with a Mermaid flowchart in traceability-protocol.md: convert the nodes and arrows into Mermaid syntax using a flowchart LR block and use labeled nodes like GH (GitHub Issue), REQ (REQ-NNN), DESIGN (DESIGN-NNN), TASK (TASK-NNN); express the main forward links (GH --> REQ --> DESIGN --> TASK) and the backward/source relationships as dashed arrows (e.g., REQ -.-> GH and GH -.-> REQ) and include the labels (translate, decompose, source: GH-number, comment: REQ-NNN) to match the proposed diagram.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In @.agents/governance/traceability-protocol.md:
- Around line 41-46: Replace the ASCII/text diagram with a Mermaid flowchart in
traceability-protocol.md: convert the nodes and arrows into Mermaid syntax using
a flowchart LR block and use labeled nodes like GH (GitHub Issue), REQ
(REQ-NNN), DESIGN (DESIGN-NNN), TASK (TASK-NNN); express the main forward links
(GH --> REQ --> DESIGN --> TASK) and the backward/source relationships as dashed
arrows (e.g., REQ -.-> GH and GH -.-> REQ) and include the labels (translate,
decompose, source: GH-number, comment: REQ-NNN) to match the proposed diagram.
The README troubleshooting section uses <code> inside <summary> tags for collapsible sections. Add code to the MD033 allowed_elements list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions
bot
added
the
infrastructure-failure
Contributor
AI Quality Gate ReviewTip ✅ Final Verdict: PASS WalkthroughThis PR was reviewed by six AI agents in parallel, analyzing different aspects of the changes:
Review Summary
💡 Quick Access: Click on individual agent jobs (e.g., "🔒 security Review", "🧪 qa Review") in the workflow run to see detailed findings and step summaries. Security Review DetailsSecurity Review: PR #1209PR Type Detection
Classification: Documentation and session artifact changes only. Findings
Analysis
RecommendationsNone. Documentation-only PR with no security implications. VerdictQA Review DetailsBased on my review of the PR: QA Review VerdictPR Type Classification
AnalysisDocumentation Changes Verified:
Quality Checks:
Test Results:
Regression Risk Assessment
Analyst Review DetailsAnalysis: PR #1209 - GitHub Issue Intake WorkflowCode Quality Score
Overall: 5/5 Impact Assessment
Findings
Recommendations
VerdictArchitect Review DetailsDesign Quality Assessment
Overall Design Score: 5/5 Architectural Concerns
Breaking Change Assessment
Technical Debt Analysis
The ADR Assessment
The changes define operational workflow (how issues become specs) rather than architectural decisions (technology choices, patterns, trade-offs). No ADR needed. Recommendations
VerdictDevOps Review DetailsDevOps Review: PR #1209PR Scope Detection
This PR contains documentation and session log files only. No workflows, actions, scripts, or build configuration changes. Pipeline Impact Assessment
CI/CD Quality Checks
Findings
Template Assessment
Automation Opportunities
The documented workflow references a Recommendations
Roadmap Review DetailsI have enough context to complete the strategic alignment review. Strategic Alignment Assessment
Feature Completeness
Impact Analysis
Concerns
Recommendations
VerdictRun Details
Powered by AI Quality Gate workflow |
rjmurillo
previously approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
rjmurillo
dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and themself
via
4bc644c
Contributor
Session Protocol Compliance ReportTip ✅ Overall Verdict: PASS All session protocol requirements satisfied. What is Session Protocol?Session logs document agent work sessions and must comply with RFC 2119 requirements:
See Compliance Summary
Detailed Validation ResultsClick each session to see the complete validation report with specific requirement failures. 📄 sessions-2026-02-25-session-1=== Session Validation === [PASS] Session log is valid ✨ Zero-Token ValidationThis validation uses deterministic script analysis instead of AI:
Powered by 📊 Run Details
Powered by Session Protocol Validator workflow |
coderabbitai
bot
added
agent-orchestrator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Summary
Document the workflow for translating GitHub Issues into the REQ, DESIGN, TASK spec layer. Add
sourcefield for bidirectional linking between issues and specs.Specification References
Spec Requirement Guidelines
docs:)Changes
traceability-protocol.mdwith 4-step workflow (triage, translate, link-back, decompose)sourcefield)sourcefield (GH-<number>pattern) to spec-schemas.md common fields and requirement schemaType of Change
Testing
Agent Review
Security Review
Other Agent Reviews
Checklist
Related Issues
Fixes #720